References

  1. Bers, M. U. (2010). The TangibleK Robotics Program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2). Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bers, M. U., Seddighin, S., & Sullivan, A. (2013). Ready for robotics: Bringing together the T and E of STEM in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 355-377. Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bill, A. M. (2018) Exploring computational thinking concepts, practices, and dispositions in K-12 computer science and engineering. Thesis. Master of Science. Nashville, Tennessee. Search in Google Scholar
  7. Boy, G. A. (2013). From STEM to STEAM: toward a human-centred education, creativity & learning thinking. In ECCE ,13 Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. Article No. 3. Toulouse, France, August 26-28, 2013. ACM New York, 2013. Search in Google Scholar
  8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501907.2501934 Open DOI
  9. Burnett, C. (2016). The digital age and its implications for learning and teaching in the primary school. A report for the Cambridge Primary Review Trust. CPRT, Research Survey 7 (new series). Search in Google Scholar
  11. CREW. Collaborative Research Experience for Women (2001). Project from Xavier University granted by the Computing Research Association (CRA). Retrieved from http://cerebro.cs.xu.edu/crew2001 Search in Google Scholar
  13. Curzon, P., Black, J., Meagher, L. R., & McOwan, P. (2009). cs4fn. org: Enthusing students about Computer Science. Proceedings of Informatics Education Europe IV, 2009, 73-80. In Mohaghegh, M., & McCauley, M. (2016). Computational Thinking: The Skill Set of the 21st Century. International Journal of Computer Search in Google Scholar
  15. DCMS (2016). Creative industries: Focus on employment. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Search in Google Scholar
  17. ECU (2015). Equality in higher education: Statistical report 2015 Part 2: Students. London: Equality Challenge Unit. Search in Google Scholar
  19. Falkner, K., Vivian, R., & Falkner, N. (2014). The Australian Digital Technologies Curriculum: Challenge and opportunity. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2014), Auckland, New Zealand. Search in Google Scholar
  21. ISACA (2016). Risks and rewards of adding augmented reality to connected devices. As the internet of things gets real, businesses get ready. ISACA 2016, IT Risk/Reward Barometer. Retrieved from http://www.isaca.org Search in Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2010). 2010 Horizon Report: K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Search in Google Scholar
  25. Kirkland, R. (2018). The role of education in AI (and vice versa). Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com Search in Google Scholar
  27. Linn, M. C. (2010) Preface. In Report of a Workshop on The Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking. National Academy of Sciences. Search in Google Scholar
  29. Mao, Y., Chen, P., Li, L., & Huang, D. (2014). Virtual reality training improves balance function. Neural Regeneration Research, 9(17), 1628-1634. Search in Google Scholar
  30. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.141795 Open DOI
  31. PMid:25368651 PMCid:PMC4211206 Search in Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, J. (2016). The digital literacy skills and competences of children of pre-school age. Media Education, Studie and Research, 7(2), 197-214. Search in Google Scholar
  35. Miller, J. L., Paciga, K. A., Danby, S., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Kaldor, T. (2017). Looking beyond swiping and tapping: Review of design and methodologies for researching young children's use of digital technologies. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(3), article 6. Search in Google Scholar
  36. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-3-6 Open DOI
  38. Mohaghegh, M., McCauley, M. (2016). Computational Thinking: The skill set of the 21st century. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 7(3), 1524-1530. Search in Google Scholar
  40. National Center for Women and Information Technology. Retrieved from https://www.ncwit.org Search in Google Scholar
  42. OECD (2012). What kinds of careers do boys and girls expect for themselves? PISA in Focus, 14. Search in Google Scholar
  44. OECD (2015) Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. PISA, OECD Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
  46. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar
  48. Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology. January. (Online). Search in Google Scholar
  49. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241 Open DOI
  51. Report of a Workshop on The Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking (2010). National Academy of Sciences. Search in Google Scholar
  53. Roesner, F. (2017). Who is thinking about security and privacy for augmented reality? Retrieved from www.technologyreview.com Search in Google Scholar
  55. Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3-4), 17-28. In Bers, M. U. (2010). The TangibleK Robotics Program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2) Search in Google Scholar
  57. Sefton-Green, J., & Brown, L. (2014). Mapping learner progression into digital creativity. Catalysts & Disconnects. A state of the art review. Nominet Trust. Retrieved from https://socialtechtrust.org Search in Google Scholar
  59. Sherman, M., & Martin, F. (2015). The assessment of mobile computational thinking. Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges, 2015. Search in Google Scholar
  61. Schultheis, M. T., & Rizzo, A. (2001). The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46(3), 296-311. Search in Google Scholar
  62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.46.3.296 Open DOI
  64. Slany, W., Kirshan, K. L., Mueller, M., Schindler, C., & Spieler, B. (2018). Rock Bottom, the World, the Sky: Catrobat, an Extremely Large-scale and Long-term Visual Search in Google Scholar
  66. Stoilescu, D., & Egodawatte, G. (2010). Gender differences in the use of computers, programming, and peer interactions in computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education, 20 (4), 283–300. Search in Google Scholar
  67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2010.527691 Open DOI
  68. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35. Search in Google Scholar
  69. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215 Open DOI
  71. Wong, B., & Kemp, P. E. J. (2018). Technical boys and creative girls: the career aspirations of digitally skilled youths. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 301-316. Search in Google Scholar
  72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1325443 Open DOI
  74. Woo, M. Y. S. (2015). Living with Technology. An investigation into young adults' challenge to prevent digital dementia. PhD thesis. Search in Google Scholar
  76. Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. contributed article. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55-62. Retrieved from https://cacm.acm.org Search in Google Scholar
  77. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591 Open DOI