Abstract
The theoretical study presented in this paper focuses on the use of augmented reality systems in education. It analyses the specifi c characteristics of augmented reality and, in the context of these parameters, it formulates didactic specifi cs of augmented reality given by the complex of didactically relevant parameters of the didactic means that distinguish it from other devices in terms of supporting the accomplishment of educational intentions. Th e paper also defi nes educational intentions of using augmented reality for increasing the informational value, exposition of temporally and spatially disparate processes and phenomena, simulations of phenomena, events and processes, acquisition and building of competence in specifi c situations and instructing in activities. Following the educational intentions, the paper also proposes complex organisational criteria for the use of augmented reality applications, which include, in particular, the proposed location for the implementation of augmented reality, the number of students for whom augmented reality is intended, the anticipated role of a student in augmented reality, required mobility and required parameters of content presentation.
References
- Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 Open DOI
- Barroso Osuna, J. M., & Gallego Pérez, O. M. (2017). Producción de recursos de aprendizaje apoyados en Realidad Aumentada por parte de estudiantes de magisterio. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 6(1), 23-38. Search in Google Scholar
- Bimber, O., & Raskar, R. (2005). Spatial augmented reality: merging real and virtual worlds. A. K. Peters. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1201/b10624 Open DOI
- Breen, D. E., et al. (1996). Interactive Occlusion and Automatic Object Placement for Augmented Reality. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics '96), 15(3), 11-22. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.1530011 Open DOI
- Brown, D. G., Coyne, J. T., & Stripling. R. (2006). Augmented reality for urban skills training. VR '06: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Virtual Reality (p. 249-252). Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.28 Open DOI
- Cabero, J., & Barroso, J. (2016). The educational possibilities of augmented reality. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 44-50. Search in Google Scholar
- Drascic, D., & Milgram, P. (1996). Perceptual issues in augmented reality. SPIE Volume 2653: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III. Search in Google Scholar
- Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1 Open DOI
- Heim, M. (1998). Virtual realism. New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
- Hong, K., Yeom, J., Jang, C., Hong, J., & Lee, B. (014). Full-color lens-array holographic optical element for three-dimensional optical see-through augmented reality. Optics Letters, 39, 127-130. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.000127 Open DOI
- PMid:24365839 Search in Google Scholar
- Hughes, C. E., Stapleton, C. B., Hughes, D. E., & Smith, E. M. (2005). Mixed reality in education, entertainment, and training. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 25, 24-30. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.139 Open DOI
- PMid:16315474 Search in Google Scholar
- Jeřábek, T., Prokýšek, M., & Rambousek, V. (2013). Parameters of augmented reality and its use in education. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 6(4), 232-244. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2013.060403 Open DOI
- Jeřábek, T., Rambousek, V., & Wildová, R. (2015). Perceptual specifics and categorisation of augmented reality systems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1740-1744. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.419 Open DOI
- Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Search in Google Scholar
- Kaufmann, H. (2004). Geometry education with augmented reality. Wien: Springer. Search in Google Scholar
- Laurel, B. (1993). Computers as theatre. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional. Search in Google Scholar
- PMid:8349811 PMCid:PMC294906 Search in Google Scholar
- Lévy, P. (2000). Kyberkultura. Praha: Karolinum. Search in Google Scholar
- Liou, H.-H., Yang, S. J. H., Chen, S. Y., & Tarng, W. (2017). The influences of the 2D image-based augmented reality and virtual reality on student learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 20(3), 110-121. Search in Google Scholar
- Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2009). New media: a critical introduction. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
- Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Anorbe-Díaz, B., & Gonzáles-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a Open DOI
- Milgram, P. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, E77-D(12). Search in Google Scholar
- Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2). Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659 Open DOI
- Oh, K. E. et al. (2011). Which properties in 3D visualizations cause comprehension difficulties? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-4. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001068 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.14504603101 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460393 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101068 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101139 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001130 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801313 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801345 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001138 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901253 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901326 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901075 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901316 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801136 Open DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801269 Open DOI
- Prokýšek, M., Rambousek, V., & Wildová, R. (2013). Research into spatial intelligence and the efficiency of the application of spatial visualization in instruction. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 855-859. Search in Google Scholar
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.661 Open DOI
- Rolland, J. P., & Hua, H. (2005/2003). Head-mounted display systems. In R. Driggers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Optical Engineering (p. 1-13). New York: Marcel Dekker. Search in Google Scholar
- PMid:16766816 Search in Google Scholar
- Ryan, M. L. (1994). Immersion vs. interactivity: virtual reality and literary theory [online]. Available from www.humanities.uci.edu Search in Google Scholar
- Yacci, M. (2000). Interactivity demystified: A structural definition for distance education and intelligent CBT. Educational Technology. Search in Google Scholar
- Zhen, B., & Blackwell, A. F. (2013). See-through window vs. magic mirror: A comparison in supporting visual-motor tasks. Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE International Symposium (p. 239-240). Search in Google Scholar
- PMid:23830445 Search in Google Scholar
Downloads
1
- Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjectshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00382-8
1