Engaging Student Teachers with Evidence: Trainers’ Perspectives of Barriers and Opportunities

Jonathan  Firth; Saima  Salehjee

doi:10.14712/23362189.2023.3112

Vol. 73 No. 4 (2023): New Challenges for Education in Times of Crisis and Major Societal Change Research paper

Engaging Student Teachers with Evidence

Trainers’ Perspectives of Barriers and Opportunities

Jonathan Firth, Saima Salehjee,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2023.3112

PDF

Abstract

In society, rights and well-being are threatened by misinformation. The next generation of teachers will be responsible for progressing evidence-based thinking in schools. In this context, it is useful to find out more about student teachers’ engagement with evidence during their training. This interview study aimed to investigate barriers to student teachers’ evidence engagement, and ways to overcome these barriers, from the perspective of the teacher trainers who work with them. Our findings suggested that trainees are more motivated to engage with research if they see it as a norm and expectation of the job, if engagement is structured in ways that meet their needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness (Ryan & Deci, 2017), and if it is prompted and encouraged by simple nudges. We discuss how promoting research engagement can contribute to education’s current and future challenges, and suggest evidence-based pedagogy as a valuable route forward.

Keywords education disinformation practitioner research engagement evidence-based practice motivation

[1] Beauvais, C. (2022). Fake news: Why do we believe it? Joint Bone Spine, 89(4), 105371. Search in Google Scholar

[2] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371 Open DOI

[3] PMid:35257865 PMCid:PMC9548403 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

[5] https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46 Open DOI

[6] Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2023). Introducing desirable difficulties into practice and instruction: Obstacles and opportunities. In C. E. Overson, C. M. Hakala, L. L. Kordonowy, & V. A. Benassi (Eds.), In their own words (pp. 19-30). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Byrne, D. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 1-22. Search in Google Scholar

[9] https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y Open DOI

[10] Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H., & Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 369-378. Search in Google Scholar

[11] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z Open DOI

[12] Čavojová, V., Secară, E. C., Jurkovič, M., & Šrol, J. (2019). Reception and willingness to share pseudo‐profound bullshit and their relation to other epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive ability in Slovakia and Romania. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 299-311. Search in Google Scholar

[13] https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3486 Open DOI

[14] Christie, D., & Menter, I. (2009). Research capacity building in teacher education: Scottish collaborative approaches. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(4), 337-354. Search in Google Scholar

[15] https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470903220414 Open DOI

[16] Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 98-121. Search in Google Scholar

[17] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002 Open DOI

[18] PMid:19568317 PMCid:PMC2702783 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Firth, J. (2021). Teachers' beliefs about memory. Studia Psychologica, 63(2), 204-220. Search in Google Scholar

[20] https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2021.02.821 Open DOI

[21] Foot‐Seymour, V., Foot, J., & Wiseheart, M. (2019). Judging credibility: Can spaced lessons help students think more critically online? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(6), 1032-1043. Search in Google Scholar

[22] https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3539 Open DOI

[23] Goldacre, B. (2012). Bad pharma: How drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients. Glasgow: Fourth Estate. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Gray, D. E. (2004). Doing research in the real world. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Halamish, V. (2018). Pre-service and in-service teachers' metacognitive knowledge of learning strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2152. Search in Google Scholar

[26] https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02152 Open DOI

[27] PMid:30473672 PMCid:PMC6238295 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Korthagen, F. A. J. (2010). How teacher education can make a difference. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(4), 407-423. Search in Google Scholar

[29] https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2010.513854 Open DOI

[30] Leat, D., Lofthouse, R., & Reid, A. (2014). Teachers' views: Perspectives on research engagement. Research and Teacher Education: The BERA-RSA Inquiry. http://www.bera.ac.uk/project/research-and-teacher-education Search in Google Scholar

[31] Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443-453. Search in Google Scholar

[32] https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271651 Open DOI

[33] PMid:15743980 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Lin, Y., Osman, M., & Ashcroft, R. (2017). Nudge: concept, effectiveness, and ethics. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 293-306. Search in Google Scholar

[35] https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1356304 Open DOI

[36] Lowden, K., Hall, S., Bravo, A., Orr, C. & Chapman, C. (2019). Scottish education system: Knowledge utilisation study. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Mols, F., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., & Steffens, N. K. (2015). Why a nudge is not enough: A social identity critique of governance by stealth. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 81-98. Search in Google Scholar

[38] https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12073 Open DOI

[39] Monereo, C. F., & Badia, A. (2020). A dialogical self-approach to understanding teacher identity in times of educational innovations. Quaderns de Psicologia, 22(2), 0003. Search in Google Scholar

[40] https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1572 Open DOI

[41] Murphy, C., Neil, P., & Beggs, J. (2007). Primary science teacher confidence revisited: Ten years on. Education Research, 49(4), 415-430. Search in Google Scholar

[42] https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701717289 Open DOI

[43] Naidoo, K., & Naidoo, L. J. (2023). Designing teaching and reflection experiences to develop candidates' science teaching self-efficacy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(1), 211-231. Search in Google Scholar

[44] https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1895098 Open DOI

[45] Nelms, A. A., & Segura-Totten, M. (2019). Expert-novice comparison reveals pedagogical implications for students' analysis of primary literature. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar56. Search in Google Scholar

[46] https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-05-0077 Open DOI

[47] PMid:31675277 PMCid:PMC6829068 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Pennycook, G., Binnendyk, J., & Rand, D. (in press). Overconfidently conspiratorial: Conspiracy believers are dispositionally overconfident and massively overestimate how much others agree with them. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications. Search in Google Scholar

[50] https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806 Open DOI

[51] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. Search in Google Scholar

[52] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 Open DOI

[53] Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413-425. Search in Google Scholar

[54] https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732 Open DOI

[55] Salehjee, S., & Cunningham, C. (2021). Developing an anti-racist approach to teaching. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-10/5%20Developing%20an%20anti-racist%20approach%20to%20teaching.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[56] Salehjee, S., & Watts, M. (2020). Becoming scientific: Lifelong science learning. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[57] Sharp, J., Hopkin, R., James, S., Peacock, G., Kelly, L., Davies, D., & Bowker, R. (2009). Teacher preparation and the national primary science curriculum: A twentieth‐anniversary perspective. Research Papers in Education, 24(3), 247-263. Search in Google Scholar

[58] https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520902725770 Open DOI

[59] Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Search in Google Scholar

[60] https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860 Open DOI

[61] https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004 Open DOI

[62] Skinner, B., Leavey, G., & Rothi, D. (2021). Managerialism and teacher professional identity: Impact on well-being among teachers in the UK. Educational Review, 73(1), 1-16. Search in Google Scholar

[63] https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1556205 Open DOI

[64] Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176-199. Search in Google Scholar

[65] https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000 Open DOI

[66] PMid:25910388 Search in Google Scholar

[67] Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: A very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 583-588. Search in Google Scholar

[68] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1 Open DOI

[69] Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[70] Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

[71] van Gestel, L. C., Adriaanse, M. A., & de Ridder, D. T. (2021). Who accepts nudges? Nudge acceptability from a self-regulation perspective. PLoS One, 16(12), e0260531. Search in Google Scholar

[72] https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260531 Open DOI

[73] PMid:34860843 PMCid:PMC8641879 Search in Google Scholar

[74] Watts, M. (2022). Science and anti-science. In J. Dillon & M. Watts (Eds.), Debates in science education (pp. 85-98). London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[75] https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003137894-8 Open DOI

[76] PMid:35197423 Search in Google Scholar

[77] Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press. Search in Google Scholar

[78] Wola, B. R., Rungkat, J. A., & Harindah, G. M. D. (2023). Science process skills of prospective science teachers' in practicum activity at the laboratory. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9(1). Search in Google Scholar

[79] https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v9i1.52974 Open DOI

Pedagogika

Engaging Student Teachers with Evidence

Abstract

References

Downloads