AbstraktProject Physware emanates from globally shared concerns on the lack of high-quality education in physics with detrimental consequences on scientiﬁc research and socio-economic progress. A signiﬁcant milestone in international cooperation, Physware aims to provide a sustainable collaborative model for capacity building of physics educators through a series of Educate the Educator workshops for those in the developing countries. The workshops are carefully designed to promote activity based pedagogic methods proven to be eﬀective through rigorous educational research. They propagate curriculum and resource materials that are easily adapted to the needs of any region. While the emphasis is on using lowcost equipment and appropriate technologies that are locally accessible, participants are also introduced to ways of integrating emerging computer-based technologies for physics teaching, contemporary research, and applications of relevance to the work place. They explore ways of teaching fundamental new physics within the context of contemporary pedagogy that is both, hands-on and minds-on. After the success of a pilot workshop held at Trieste in 2009, the Physware series was launched in 2012 from the University of Delhi. Both workshops brought together a vibrant and eclectic group of participants who contributed actively to creation of innovative resource materials. It is hoped that many participants will emerge as regional leaders. Feedback shows that going beyond the constraints of its workshop format, Physware has the potential to emerge as a professionally networked community of practice.
Benegas, J. (2009). Report of the 2nd Regional South Cone Workshop on Active Learning in Mechanics (AAMe- C´ordoba’09) and the 2nd Regional South Cone Conference on Active Learning in Physics (CRAAF-2). Available at http://journal.lapen.org.mx/sep09/31 LAJPE 288 Julio Benegas.pdf
Berg, R.E. (2012). Resource Letter PhD-2: Physics Demonstrations. Am. J. Phys. 80, 181.
comPADRE. (n.d.). Available at http://www.compadre.org
Ding, L., Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B., et. al. (2006). Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment. Physical Review Special Topics — Physics Education Research 2, 010105.
IUPAP Website. (n.d.). Available at http://www.iupap.org
Jolly, P. (2002). An Indigenous Process of Pedagogic Innovation: A Case Study on Curriculum Development, AI & Soc., 16, 148–162.
Jolly, P. (2001). A Refresher Course in Physics Education: Training College Teachers to do Classroom Research. In R. Pinto & S. Surinach (Eds), Physics Teacher Education Beyond 2000 (249–252). Elsevier.
Jolly, P., Bhatia, V.B. & Verm, M. (2001). Developing a Research-based Laboratory Curriculum for College Physics (workshop). In R. Pinto and S. Surinach (Eds), Physics Teacher Education Beyond 2000 (319–324). Elsevier.
Jolly, P. & Laws, P. (2006). World Conference on Physics and Sustainable Development, ICPE Newsletter, 51(3).
Kansas State University Physics Education Research Group (2010). Modern Miracle Medical Machines, http://www.phys.ksu.edu
Knight, R.D. (2004). Five Easy Lessons — Strategies for Successful Physics Teaching. Addison Wesley.
Laws, P.W. (1997). Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory physics courses, Am. J. Phys. 65, 14–21.
Laws, P.W. (2004). Workshop Physics Activity Guide: The Physics Suite. Volumes 1 to 4, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Laws, P.W. (2008). A Lens into the World, AAPT Interactions, 21–23.
Laws, P.W., Teese, R.B. & Willis, C.W., et.al. (2009). Physics with Video Analysis. Vernier Software & Technology.
McDermott, L.C. & Redish, E.F. (1999). Resource letter PER-1: Physics Education Research. Am. J. Phys, 67, 755–767.
McDermott, L.C. & Shaﬀer, P.S. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding. Am. J. Phys. 60 (11), 994–1003.
McDermott, L.C. & Shaﬀer, P., et.al. (1998). Tutorials in Introductory Physics. Prentice-Hall Inc.
Meltzer, D.E. & Thornton, R.K. (2012). Resource Letter ALIP-1: Active-Learning Instruction in Physics.Am. J. Phys. 80, 478.
Physware workshop (2009). ICTP, Trieste, Italy, Available at http://cdsagenda5.ictp.trieste.it/full display.php?ida=a07137
Radjou, N., Prabhu, J. & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad Innovation: A Frugal and Flexible Approach to Innovation for the 21st Century. Random House India.
Redish, E.F. (2003). Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rocha, F.S.D. & Fajardo, F., et.al. (2011). Using “Student Technology” in Introductory Physics: A Comparison of Three High Tech Tools to Study Falling Objects. The Physics Teacher, 49, 165–167.
Science (2013). Grand Challenges in Science Education. Special Issue, 340 (6130).
Sokoloﬀ, D.R., Thornton, R.K. & Laws, P. (1999, 2004). RealTime Physics: Active Learning Laboratories: The Physics Suite. Volumes 1 to 4, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sokoloﬀ, D.R. & Thornton, R.K. (2004). Interactive Lecture Demonstrations — Active Learning in Introductory Physics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Shaﬀer, P.S. & McDermott, L.C. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of Instructional Strategies. Am. J. Phys. 60 (11), 1003–1013.