AbstraktIn this contribution we describe a research aimed at pointing out the quality of mental models undergraduate engineering students deploy when asked to create explanations for phenomena/processes and/or use a given model in the same context. Student responses to a specially designed written questionnaire are initially analyzed using researcher-generated categories of reasoning, based on the Physics Education Research literature on student understanding of the relevant physics content. The inferred students’ mental models about the analyzed phenomena are categorized as practical, descriptive, or explanatory, based on an analysis of student responses to the questionnaire. A qualitative analysis of interviews conducted with students after the questionnaire administration is also used to deepen some aspects which emerged from the quantitative analysis and validate the results obtained.
Azmita, M. & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the
development of scientific reasoning. Soc. Dev., 2(3), 202–221.
Bao, L. (1999). Dynamics of student modeling: A theory, algorithms, and application to
quantum mechanics [Dissertation thesis]. College Park: University of Maryland.
Bao, L. & Redish, E.F. (2006). Model analysis: Representing and assessing the
dynamics of student learning. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., 2, 010103.
Berg, B. (1989). An introduction to content analysis. In B. Berg (Ed.), Qualitative
Research Methods, Boston: Allyn & Baron Press.
Brewer, J. & Hunter, A. (2006). Foundations of multimethod research: synthesizing
styles. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht:
Carley, K. & Palmquist, M. (1992). Extracting, representing and analyzing mental
models. Social Forces, 70(3), 601–636.
Chittleborough, G. & Treagust, D. F. (2007). The modelling ability of non-major
chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chemistry
Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 274–292.
Corpuz, E.D. & Rebello, N. S. (2011). Investigating students’ mental models and
knowledge construction of microscopic friction. I. Implications for curriculum design and
development. Phys. Rev. ST – Phys. Ed. Res., 7, 020102.
Fazio, C., Battaglia, O.R. & Di Paola, B. (2013). Investigating the quality of mental
models deployed by undergraduate engineering students in creating explanations: The
case of thermally activated phenomena. Physical Review Special Topics —- Physics
Education Research, 9, 020101.
Gilbert, J.K. & Boulter, C. (1998). Learning science through models and modelling. In
B. J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Gilbert, J.K., Boulter, C. & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations: Part 1,
horses for courses? Int. J. Sci. Educ., 20(1), 83–97.
Gower, J.C. (1966). Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in
multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53(3–4), 325–338.
Hrepic, Z., Zollman, D.A. & Rebello, N. S. (2005). Eliciting and representing hybrid
mental models. In Proceedings of the NARST 2005.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, N. L. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative analysis tools: A call
for data analysis triangulation. School Psychol. Quart., 22(4), 557–584.
Lerman, I.C. (1981). Classification et Analyse Ordinale Des Donn´ees. Paris: Dunod.
Lerman, I.C., Gras, R. & Rostam, H. (1981). Elaboration et évaluation d’un indice
d’implication pour des données binaries. I. Math. Sci. Hum., 74, 5–35.
Lerman, I.C., Gras, R. & Rostam, H. (1981). Elaboration et ´evaluation d’un indice
d’implication pour des donn´ees binaries. 2. Math. Sci. Hum., 75, 5–47.
Maloney, D. & Siegler, R. S. (1993). Conceptual competition in physics learning. Int. J.
Sci. Educ., 15(3), 283–295.
Mantegna, R.N. (1999). Hierarchical structure in financial markets. Eur. Phys. J.,
Marton, F. (1988). Describing and improving learning. In R.R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning
strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R. & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientists: ways of
helping children to use language to learn science. Brit. Educ. Res. J., 30(3), 359–377.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., Slate, J.R., Stark, M., Sharma, B., Frels, R., Harris, K.
& Combs, J.P. (2012). An exemplar for teaching and learning qualitative research.
Qual. Rep., 17(1), 16–77.
Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M., Fazio, C. & Tarantino, G. (2006). Pedagogical content
knowledge development and pre-service physics teacher education: a case study. Res.
Sci. Ed., 36(3), 235–268.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social
& behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.