História induktívneho prístupu v prírodovednom vzdelávaní v USA a jeho súčasná reflexia na Slovensku

Jak citovat

Minárechová, M. (2020). História induktívneho prístupu v prírodovednom vzdelávaní v USA a jeho súčasná reflexia na Slovensku. Scientia in Educatione, 5(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.94


V súčasnej dobe má v prírodovednom vzdelávaní veľké zastúpenie induktívny spôsob vyučovania a učenia sa, pod ktorý spadá aj na Slovensku čoraz viac známa výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania (Inquiry-Based Science Education, IBSE). V príspevku sa snažíme priblížiť a objasniť vznik a vývoj výskumne ladenej koncepcie prírodovedného vzdelávania; od objasnenia pojmu bádanie, jeho podoby v historickom kontexte, postupné začleňovanie do kurikulárnych dokumentov až po jeho súčasnú podobu. Zameriavame sa na americkú históriu prírodovedného vzdelávania, pretože práve v tomto prostredí nachádzame prvé zmienky o bádaní ako vyučovacej metóde.


Abd”El”Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok”Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., ... & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419.

Afra, N. Ch., Osta, I., Zoubeir, W. (2009). Students Alternative Conceptions about Electricity and Effect of Inquiry-Based Teaching Strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 103-132.

Akgul, E.,M. (2006). Teaching science in an inquiry-based learning environment: What it means for pre-service elementary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1),71–81.

Jardine, L., Silverthorne, M. (eds.). (2000). Bacon, Francis. The New Organon. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Banchi, H., Bell, R. (2008). The Many Levels of Inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29

Barrow, L.,H. (2006). A Brief History of Inquiry: From Dewey to Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278.

Blanpied, W. A., Atkinson, R. C. Social Scientists’ Contributions to Science Policy during the New Deal. Dostupné z http://rca.ucsd.edu/speeches/Social_Science_and_Science_Policy.pdf

Bybee, R.W. (1997). The Sputnik Era: Why Is This Educational Reform Different From All Other Reforms? A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/bybee1.htm

Chiappetta, E., L. (1997). Inquiry-Based Science Strategies and techniques for encouraging inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher, 64(7), 22-26.

Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44.

DeBoer, G., E. (1997). What we have learned and where we are headed lessons from the Sputnik era. A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/deboer.htm

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.

Dow, P. (1997). Sputnik revisited: Historical perspectives on science reform. A symposium Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Dostupné z http://www.nas.edu/sputnik/dow2.htm

Gentry, J. W. (1990). What is experiential learning? In J. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaining and experiential learning (9-20). East Brunswick, CN: Nichols/GP Publishing.

Haury, D.,L. (1993). Teaching Science through Inquiry. ERIC/CSMEE Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education Columbus OH.

Held, Ľ. a kol. (2011). Výskumne ladená koncepcia prírodovedného vzdelávania. Trnava: Pedagogická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity v Trnave.

Hovey, A., Hazelwood, C., Svedkauskaite, A (2005). Critical Issue: Science Education in the Era of No Child Left Behind—History, Benchmarks, and Standards. Dostupné z http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/sc600.htm

Chambers, C. (2002). Multi-Curricular Inquiry-Based Learning. City College of the City University of New York: condor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/.../carlchambers.researchpaper.doc

Kim, M., Chin, Ch. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ views on practical work with inquiry orientation in textbook-oriented science classrooms. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6(1), 23-37.

Learning Point Associates. (2005). Using Student Engagement to Improve Adolescent Literacy. NCREL Quick Key Action Guide, 4. Dostupné z http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/qkey4.pdf.

Macmillan a McGraw-Hill, (2005). The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Science Education. Penn Plaza New York. Dostupné z http://www.mheresearch.com/assets/products/9b04d152845ec0a3/McGraw_Hill_Science_ReportFINAL1.pdf

McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511-532.

Meador, G. (1988). Relating the Nature of Science and the Central Purpose of American Education to the Learning Cycle. Dostupné z http://www.bps-ok.org/physics/papers/learned.pdf.

Milton, J. R. (1987). Induction before Hume. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38(1), 49-74.

National Research Council (U.S.). (1993). National Science Education Standards: An Enhanced Sample. A Working Paper of National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment.

Olson, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press. Dostupné z http://books.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/committee.html

Park, D.-Y. (2006) . Curriculum Reform Movement in the US – Science Education. Paper Presented at the 1st Pacific Rim Conference on Education, Hokkaido University of Education, Hokkaido, Japan.

Pea, R. D., & Collins, A. (2008). Learning how to do science education: Four waves of reform. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (3–12). New York: Teachers College Press.

Prince M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research based. Journal of Engineering Education 95(2), 123-138.

Frank, M. (1989). Project 2061: Science for All Americans. (1989). Psychologist. 32(5).

Project 2061. (1985). Dostupné z http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/default.htm

Rocard., M. a kol.(2007). Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Luxembourg. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,

Schwab, J. J. (2007). Guide to the Joseph J. Schwab papers 1939–1986. Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library. Dostupné z http://ead. lib. uchicago. edu/learn_on3. php.

Stine, D. D. (2010). US Civilian Space Policy Priorities: Reflections 50 Years After Sputnik. DIANE Publishing. Dostupné z http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RL34263 February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service.

Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., Tsai, C. C., & Cheng, S. F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 541-566.

University of Chicago Library. (2007). Guide to the Joseph J. Schwab Papers 1939-1986. Dostupné z WWW: http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.SCHWABJJ

Wang, H. A., & Marsh, D. D. (2002). Science instruction with a humanistic twist: teachers' perception and practice in using the history of science in their classrooms. Science & Education, 11(2), 169-189.