Abstrakt
Jedním z problémů ve výuce přírodních věd je konstrukce platných vědeckých vztahů mezi pojmy. Průzkum, který proběhl mezi 15 učiteli přírodních věd, zjišťoval, jak zvládají konstrukci pojmových map. Umět konstruovat pojmové mapy je klíčové, protože to učitelům pomáhá plánovat průběh výuky. Pro učitele bylo náročné uspořádat pojmy hierarchicky, užívat propoziční spoje a vzájemné propojení pojmů. Článek navrhuje, aby pomoc učitelům zaměřená na zvládání těchto problémů zahrnovala výukové a učební strategie pracující se vztahy mezi pojmy, například pojmové mapování.Reference
AUSTIN, L. B., SHORE, B. M. 1995. Using concept mapping for assessment in physics. Physics Education, 30, 1995, 41–45.
AUSUBEL, D. P. Educational psychology: A Cognitive View. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
BABBIE, E., MOUTON, J. The practice of social research: Oxford University Press Southern Africa; Belmont : Cape Town, 2001.
BYRNE, J., GRACE, M. Using a Concept Mapping Tool with a Photograph Association Technique (CoMPAT) to Elicit Children’s Ideas about Microbial Activity,
International Journal of Science Education, 32, 4, 2010, p. 479–500. Retrieved 25 May 2011 from EBSCOhost.
CLARK, E. V. Meaning: Development. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2006, p. 577–583.
DALEY, B. J., TORRE, D. M. Concept maps in medical education: an analytical literature review. Medical Education, 44(5), 2010, 440–448.
DAWKINS, K., DICKERSON, D., MCKINNEY, S., BUTLER, S. Teaching Density to Middle School Students: Preservice Science Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Practices, Clearing House, 82, 1, 2008, p. 21–26. Retrieved 1 July 2011 from EBSCO host.
DUIT, R., TREAGUST, D. F., MANSFIELD, H. Investigating student understanding as prerequisite to improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, B. J. Fraser (Eds). Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics, 1996, p. 17–31. Teachers college : Columbia University.
HODSON, D. Teaching and learning science, towards a personalized approach. Buckingham. Phil., Miss. : Open University Press, 1998.
INGEC, S. Analysing Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in Teaching Physics and Comparison with the Achievement Tests. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 2009, 1 897–1 915.
LEMMER, M. Analysis of South African Grade 10 learners’ conceptual resources regarding the concept of energy in Physics. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), 2011, 4–17.
MCMILLAN, J. H., Schumacher, S. Research in Education: A conceptual Introduction. 4th ed. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc : New York, 1997.
MCNEESE, M. D, AYOUB, P. J. Concept mapping in the analysis and design of cognitive sytems: a historical review. (In B. M. Moon, R. R. Hoffman, J. D. Novak, A. J. Canas (Eds). Applied concept mapping, capturing, analysing and organising knowledge, p. 3–21. CRC press. London, 2011
MOON, B. M., HOFFMAN, R. R., ESKRIDGE, T. C., COFFEY, J. W. Skills in concept mapping. (In B. M. Moon, R. R. Hoffman, J. D. Novak, A. J. Canas (Eds). Applied concept mapping, capturing, analysing and organising knowledge, p. 3–21. CRC press. London, 2011.
NOVAK, J. D. Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional science, 19, 1990, 29–52.
NOVAK, J. D. Concept mapping: A tool for improving science teaching and learning. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, B. J. Fraser (Eds). Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics, p.32–43. Teachers college : Columbia University, 1996.
NOVAK, J. D., CANAS, A. J. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Pensacola FI, 32502. Retrieved 12 July 2011 from http://www.ihmc.us. 2006
NOVAK, J. D., CANAS, A. J. Applying tools and ideas in the corporate world. (In B. M. Moon, R. R. Hoffman, J. D. Novak, A. J. Canas (Eds). Applied concept mapping, capturing, analysing and organising knowledge, p. 3–21. CRC press. London, 2011.
NOVAK, J. D., GOWIN, D. B. Learning to learn. Cambridge University Press. : London, 1984.
ODED, B., STAVANS, A. The effect of “false” schema activation on the construction of meaning. System, 22, (4), 1994, 497–507.
OKEBUKOLA, P. A. Concept mapping with a cooperative learning flavor. The American Biology teacher, 54 (4), 1992.
PIAGET, J. The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. (New translation of the development of thought ed). Chigaco : University of Chicago Press, 1985.
RUIZ-PRIMO, M. A., SHAVELSON, R. J. Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of research in science teaching, 33 (6), 1996, 569–600.
SCHEIN, E. Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes Toward a Model of Managed Learning, Systems practice, 1995.
SILVERMAN, D. Qualitative analysis research: theory, method and practice. Thousand oaks, CA : Sage, 2004.
SLOTTE, V., LONKA, K. Spontaneous concept maps aiding the understanding of scientific concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 1999, 515–531.
STODDART, T., ABRAMS, R., GASPER, E., CANADAY, D. Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning — a report of methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 2000, 1 221–1 246.
TREAGUST, D. F., DUIT, R. Conceptual change: a discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3:297–328, 2008.
VAN ZELE, E., LENAERTS, J., WIEME, W. Improving the usefulness of concept maps as a research tool for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 2004, 1 043–1 064.
WATTS, M. Constructivism, reconstructivism and task-orientated problem-solving. In P. J. Fensham (ed.), The content of science, p. 39–58. London : Falmer, 1994.
WHEELDON, J., FAUBERT, J. Framing Experience: Concept Maps, Mind Maps, and Data Collection in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 2009, 68–83. Retrieved 22 August 2011 from EBSCOhost.