Geology at the Lower Secondary Educational Level (ISCED 2): Comparison of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Slovenia and Poland
pdf

How to Cite

Jedličková, T., Svobodová, A., & Kachlík, V. (2019). Geology at the Lower Secondary Educational Level (ISCED 2): Comparison of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Slovenia and Poland: Comparison of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Slovenia and Poland. Scientia in Educatione, 10(3), 72-93. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1265

Abstract

Geology is a science with a highly interdisciplinary character. Thus, in education it is ideal to provide education in a form integrated with the other branches of natural sciences under the subject of Science or Natural Sciences. However, most European countries prefer separate teaching of the individual educational fields and subsume geology within one of them, most frequently biology or geography. The submitted study discusses the potential advantages and disadvantages of various strategies of allocation of geological topics in education. A comparative method is used to evaluate and analyse curricular documents in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Slovenia and Poland at the lower secondary educational level. The comparison is focused on the scope and incorporation of selected educational content of geology into individual educational subjects, and on the recommended teaching methods suitable for interpreting geological subject matter. On the basis of this knowledge from abroad, individual subjects are selected for the “best practice” and subsequently proposed for implementation under the conditions in the Czech Republic. This seeks to make geology more familiar and attractive for students at the lower secondary level of education.

https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1265
pdf

References

Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Research into STS science education. Educación Química, 16(3), 384–397. doi: 10.22201/fq.18708404e.2005.3.66101

Bicanová, L. (2013). Míra popularity geologických věd mezi žáky základních škol a víceletých gymnázií [Bakalářská práce]. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta.

Czerniak, C.M. (2014). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (537–559). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. doi: 10.4324/9780203097267.ch20

Erlingsson, C. & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7, 93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001

Euridyce. (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA P9 Eurydice). doi: 10.2797/7170

Fermeli, G., Meléndez, G., Calonge, A., Dermitzakis, M., Steininger, F., Koutsouveli, A., Neto de Carvalho, C., Rodrigues, J., D’arpa, C. & Patti, C. (2011). GEOSCHOOLS: Innovative teaching of geosciences in secondary schools and raising awareness on geoheritage in the society. In E. Fernández-Martínez & R. Casta˜no de Luis (Eds.), Avances y retos en la conservación del Partimonio Geológico en Espa˜na (120–124).

Actas de la IX Reunión Nacional de la Comisión de Patrimonio Geológico (Sociedad Geológica de Espa˜na), Léon, Universidad de Léon.

Lederman, N.G. & Niess, M. L. (1997). Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics? School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 57–58.

Hejnová, E. (2011). Integrovaná výuka přírodovědných předmětů na základních školách v českých zemích – minulost a současnost. Scied 2(2), 77–90.

Jeníková, K. (2017). Možnosti výuky geologie na gymnáziích. Diplomová práce. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.

Jeřábek, J. & Tupý, J., et al. (2005). Manuál pro tvorbu školních vzdělávacích programů v základním vzdělávání. Praha: VÚP.

Jeřábek, J. & Tupý, J., et al. (2017). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání, Praha: MŠMT. Available at http://www.msmt.cz/file/41216/

King, C. (2001). The response of teachers to new content in a national science curriculum: the case of the Earth-science component. Science Education, 85, 636–664. doi: 10.1002/sce.1030

King, C. (2004). Earth science at school level in the UK. ESEF (EW). Conference — Improving the effectivenness of education resources for Earth science and industry, 19 October 2004, London.

Meléndez, G., Fermeli, G. & Koutsouveli, A. (2007). Analyzing geology textbooks for secondary school curricula in Greece and Spain: Educational use of geological heritage. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 40, 1819–1832. doi: 10.12681/bgsg.17143

Ministry of Education and Research. (2014). National curriculum for basic schools. Tallin.

Ministry of Education and Sport. (2011). White Paper on education in the Republic of Slovenia. Ljubljana.

Ministry of National Education. (2002). Core Curriculum for Pre-school and General Education. Warsaw.

OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. Available at https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf, doi: 10.1787/9789264273856-en

Osborne, J., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199

Pařízková, Š. (2015). Průzkum zájmu o neživou přírodu u studentů ZŠ a SŠ na Chrudimsku [Bakalářská práce]. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta.

Pluskalová, J. (2004). Rámcový vzdělávací program a výuka geologie na základní škole a čtyřletém gymnáziu. E-pedagogium, 2005(2), 50–57.

Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henrikson, H. & Hermmo, U. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels:

European Comission, Directorate-General for Research, Science, Economy and Society, Information and Communication Unit, Brussels. doi: 10.12691/education-3-7-14

Sjøberg, S., 2002. Science and technology education in Europe: Current challenges and possible solutions. Connect: UNESCO International Science, Technology & Environmental Education Newsletter, 27(3–4), 1–4. Available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001463/146315e.pdf [Accessed 22 October 2018]

Škoda, J. & Doulík, P. (2009). Vývoj paradigmat přírodovědného vzdělávání. Pedagogická orientace, 19(3), 24–44.

UNESCO (2012). International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. Quebec: UNESCO Institute for Statistic. ISBN 978-92-9189-123. Available at http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classificationof-education-isced-2011-en.pdf.

Wake, M.H. (2000). Integrative biology as a framework for education and training. Biology International, 2000(39), 49–55.

Wake, M.H. (2008). Integrative biology: Science for the 21st century. BioScince, 58(4), 349–353. doi: 10.1641/B580410