What is the Czech (Historical) Science Lacking?

Response to a ‘Manifesto’ of Four Young Historians

Authors

  • Zdeněk R. Nešpor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14712/24645370.2633

Abstract

In his contribution, the author adopts a stance with respect to views published in a critical essay by Pavel Baloun, Jan Gruber, Jan Mareš, and Vít Strobach, O výuce historie za kapitalismu a o mluvících hlavách (On Teaching History Under Capitalism and on Talking Heads; Dějiny – teorie – kritika 8/2012, p. 121-144). The text focuses mainly on explaining the function of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, whose evaluation mechanisms authors of the abovementioned article criticise. Th e author of this contribution also considers the degree to which the professionally established members of the Grant Agency can or may be criticised by young authors who cannot as yet present any comparable scientific achievements limitations and concludes by thoughts of ethics of science.

Author Biography

Zdeněk R. Nešpor

Zdeněk R. Nešpor (*1976) is active in the Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences and at Faculty of Humanities, Charles University

Published

2012-12-01

How to Cite

Nešpor, Zdeněk R. 2012. “What Is the Czech (Historical) Science Lacking? Response to a ‘Manifesto’ of Four Young Historians”. Dějiny – Teorie – Kritika, no. 2 (December):297–304. https://doi.org/10.14712/24645370.2633.

Issue

Section

Discussions and Disputes