Professional Vision of Pre-service Biology Teachers Focused on Subject and Subject Didactics Phenomena
PDF (Čeština)

How to Cite

Pavlasová, L. (2017). Professional Vision of Pre-service Biology Teachers Focused on Subject and Subject Didactics Phenomena. Scientia in Educatione, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1006

Abstract

Professional vision represents one dimension of teachers’ professionalism. The general consensus is that it should be developed during the standard teacher-training process. In order to choose an effective intervention mechanism, the teacher needs to be familiar with the proficiency of the students at the beginning of the teaching process. The submitted study focuses on pre-service biology teachers (n = 26), with the aim of assessing their noticing abilities and knowledge-based reasoning skills. These are detected by a qualitative analysis of written reflections on videos of someone else’s teaching. Using the category system devised by Sherin and van Es (2009) it was found that students’ reflections contained more statements focused on the teacher and pedagogy, typically  expressing a descriptive and evaluative stance. Further analysis showed that statements associated with the pupils were more often interpreted by students than the ones associated with the teacher, where description and evaluation tended to be the predominant stances. Statements associated with subject and subject didactics can be thematically divided into two  broad groups: (1) methods, forms, process and concept of teaching and (2) goal of teaching, expected outcomes, competencies, content of teaching. Neglected topics are e.g. teaching aids, motivation, activation and attention of pupils, teacher’s instructions and teacher’s mistakes. The presented findings provide important information for the guarantors of courses specializing in the didactics of biology.

https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1006
PDF (Čeština)

References

Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K. & Seidel, T. (2011). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers’ teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131-1140.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.

Janík, T. & Seidel, T. (eds). The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. New York: Waxman, 2009.

Ling Wong, S., Wai Yung, B. H., Cheng, M. W., Lam, K. L., & Hodson, D. (2006). Setting the stage for developing pre”service teachers’ conceptions of good science teaching: the role of classroom videos. International Journal of Science Education, 28(1), 1-24.

Martin S.N. & Siry C. (2012). Using video in science teacher education: An analysis of the utilization of video-based media by teacher educators and researchers. In: Fraser B., Tobin K., McRobbie C. (eds). Second International Handbook of Science Education (417-433). Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht.

McConnell, T. J., Lundeberg, M. A., Koehler, M. J., Urban-Lurain, M., Zhang, T., Mikeska, J., ... & Eberhardt, J. (2008, January). Video-based teacher reflection–What is the real effect on reflections of inservice teachers. Příspěvek prezentovaný na konferenci International Conference of the Association of Science Teacher Educators, Saint Louis, USA.

Minaříková, E. & Janík, T. (2012). Profesní vidění učitelů: od hledání pojmu k možnostem jeho uchopení. Pedagogická orientace, 22(2), 181–204.

Minaříková, E., Píšová, M., Janík, T., & Uličná, K. (2015). Video Clubs: EFL Teachers’ Selective Attention Before and After. Orbis Scholae, 9(2), 55-75.

Mitchell, R. N., & Marin, K. A. (2015). Examining the use of a structured analysis framework to support prospective teacher noticing. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 551-575.

Pavlasová, L., Stará, J., Vondrová, N., Novotná, M., Robová, J. & Uličná, K. (2017, v recenzním řízení). Výběrové zaměření pozornosti u studentů učitelství a povaha jejich interpretací. Pedagogika, 67(x), xxx-xxx. BUDE UPŘESNĚNO

Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117-148.

Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 10(2), 123-140.

Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others?. Teaching and teacher education, 27(2), 259-267.

Sherin, M. G. & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teacher and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163-183.

Sherin, M. G. & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of technology and teacher education, 13(3), 475-491.

Sherin, M. G. & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision, Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.

Simpson, A., Vondrová, N., & Žalská, J. (2017). Sources of shifts in pre-service teachers’ patterns of attention: the roles of teaching experience and of observational experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20, 1-24.

Sonmez, D. & Hakverdi-Can, M. (2012). Videos as an instructional tool in pre-service science teacher education. In: Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 141-158.

Steffensky, M., Gold, B., Holdynski, M., & Möller, K. (2015). Professional Vision of Classroom Management and Learning Support in Science Classrooms—Does Professional Vision Differ Across General and Content-Specific Classroom Interactions?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 351-368.

Stehlíková, N. (2010). Interpretace některých didakticko-matematických jevů u studentů učitelství au učitelů matematiky. Pedagogika, 60(3-4), 303-313.

Stockero, S. L. (2008). Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 373-394.

Svatoš, T. (2013). A student teacher on the pathway to teaching profession: Reviewing research and proposing a model. Pedagogická orientace, 23(6), 786–809.

Syslová, Z. (2016). Rozvoj profesního vidění studentů oboru Učitelství pro mateřské školy. Pedagogika, 66(4), 462–476.

Talanquer, V., Tomanek, D., & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students' understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 189-208.

Uličná, K. (2017). To see or not to see: Profesní vidění budoucích učitelů anglického jazyka a budoucích učitelů pro 1. stupeň se specializací na anglický jazyk. Pedagogická orientace, 27(1), 81-103.

Uličná, K., Stará, J. & Novotná, M. (2017). Teacher In The Eyes Of Future Primary School Teachers. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Efficiency and Responsibility in Education (490 – 497). Prague: Czech University of Life Sciences.

Vondrová, N., Robová, J. & Pavlasová, L. (2017). Future secondary teachers’ knowledge-based reasoning when observing a lesson. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Efficiency and Responsibility in Education (536 – 544). Prague: Czech University of Life Sciences.

Vondrová, N., & Žalská, J. (2015). Ability to notice mathematics specific phenomena: What exactly do student teachers attend to? Orbis scholae, 9(2) 77â101.