A comparative analysis of chemistry curriculum for lower secondary education in the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia and Estonia
pdf

How to Cite

Stratilová Urválková, E., Teplá, M., & Janoušková, S. (2019). A comparative analysis of chemistry curriculum for lower secondary education in the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia and Estonia. Scientia in Educatione, 10(3), 50-71. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1293

Abstract

This article presents an analysis based on the principles of (international) comparative
pedagogy focusing on the study of the similarities and differences in subject-specific competences,
educational content, and teaching strategies and methods. The analysis focuses
on the field of chemistry, specifically the intended curriculum of the abovementioned countries for the level of lower secondary education. Three parameters were monitored and compared: the number of hours allocated for the teaching of chemistry, of all science subjects from the 6th to 9th grades, the educational content of the subject of chemistry and the teaching strategies discussed and/or recommended for the teaching of natural sciences. Analysis has shown that chemistry is taught for the same length of time, but chemistry topics in Slovenia and Estonia are also taught within the subject Natural Sciences in the 7th grade. The expected outcomes are comparable in all countries, but Czech outcomes are grouped into broad topic areas with few outcomes. The expected outcomes from other countries are specified in much more detail. The recommended teaching methods are most closely described in the Slovenian curriculum, which also contains extensive didactic recommendations for individual subjects.

https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.1293
pdf

References

Andersen, S.C., Humlum, M.K. & Nandrup, A. B. (2016). Increasing instruction time in school does increase learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(27), 7481–7484. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516686113

Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D. & Tice, D.M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x

Blažek, R. & Přihodova, S. (2016). Mezinarodni šetřeni PISA 2015: narodni zprava, přirodovědna gramotnost. Praha: Česka školni inspekce. Retrieved from https://www.csicr.cz/cz/Dokumenty/Publikace/Narodni-zprava-PISA-2015

Cattaneo, M. A., Oggenfuss, Ch. & Wolter, S.C. (2017). The more, the better? The impact of instructional time on student performance. Education Economics, 25(5), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1315055

Domerecka, B., Le´sniewska, I., Sikora, R. & Ta_lan, P. (2008). Poradnik dla direktora szko_ly podstawowej - ramowe plany nauczania. Warszawa: O´srodek Rozwoju Edukacji. Retrieved from http://www.bc.ore.edu.pl/Content/268/poradnik dla dyrektora sp ramowe plany nauczania.pdf

Duckworth, A. L. & Seligman, M. E.P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198

Durik, A. M. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.597

Eurydice. (2018a). Poland overview. Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/Eurydice/content/poland en Eurydice. (2018b). Slovenia overview. Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/Eurydice/content/slovenia en

Eurydice. (2018c). Estonia overview. Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/Eurydice/content/estonia enGovernment of the republic of Estonia. (2011). National curriculum for basic schools –Regulation. Tallin. Retrieved from https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/est basic school nat cur 2014 general part 1.pdf

Hidi, S. & Renninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 4(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102 4

HTM (The Ministry of Education and Research). (2018a). Republic of Estonia education act. Retrieved from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/526082014004/consolide/current

HTM (The Ministry of Education and Research). (2018b). Basic schools and upper secondary schools act. Retrieved from: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/530102013042/consolide

Jensen, V.M. (2013). Working longer makes students stronger? The effects of ninth grade classroom hours on ninth grade student performance. Educational Research, 55(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.801244

Juuti, K. & Lavonen, J., et al. (2010). Science teaching methods preferred by grade 9 students in Finland. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9177-8

Kapcia, A., Kulesza, D. & Rudnik, J. (2008). Poradnik dla dyrektora gimnazjum – ramowe plany nauczania. Warszawa: O´srodek rozwoju edukacji. Retrieved from http://www.bc.ore.edu.pl/Content/269/poradnik dla dyrektora gimnazjum ramowe plany nauczania.pdf

Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V. S., Foy, P. & Hooper, M. (2016a). Instructional time spent on science. TIMSS 2015 International results in science. Retrieved from http://timss2015.org/timss-2015/science/classroom-instruction/instructional-time-spent-on-science/

Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V. S., Foy, P. & Hooper, M. (2016b). Distribution of science achievement. Instructional time spent on science. TIMSS 2015 international results in science. Retrieved from http://timss2015.org/timss-2015/science/student-achievement/distribution-of-science-achievement/

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Retrieved from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089

Mead, G.H. (1906). Teaching of science in college. Science, 24(613), 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.24.613.390

MEN (Ministry of National Education of Poland). (circa 2007). Podstawa programowa (III i IV etapie). Retrieved from https://men.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/zalaczniknr4.pdf

MEN (Ministry of National Education of Poland). (2018). Podstawa programowa, škola podstawowa, Chemia. Retrieved from https://podstawaprogramowa.pl/Szkola-podstawowa-IV-VIII/Chemia

Meyer, E. & van Klaveren, C. (2013). The effectiveness of extended day programs: Evidence from a randomized field experiment in the Netherlands. Economics of Education Review, 36(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.002

MIZS (Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia). (2018a). The education programme. Retrieved from http://www.mizs.gov.si/si/delovna podrocja/direktorat za predsolsko vzgojo in osnovno solstvo/osnovno solstvo/MIZS (Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia). (2018b).

Predmetnik osnovne šole. Retrieved from http://www.mizs.gov.si/fileadmin/mizs.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocje/os/devetletka/predmetniki/Pred 14 OS 4 12.pdf

MIZS (Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia). (2011a). Program osnovna šola. Naravoslovje – učni načrt. Ljubljana: MIZS. Retrieved from http://www.mizs.gov.si/fileadmin/mizs.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocje/os/prenovljeni UN/UN naravoslovje.pdf

MIZS (Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia). (2011b). Program osnova šola. Kemija. Učni načrt. Ljubljana. Retrieved from http://www.mizs.gov.si/fileadmin/mizs.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocje/os/prenovljeni UN/UN kemija.pdf

MIZS (Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia). (2016). Organisation and financing of education act. Slovenia. Retrieved from http://www.mizs.gov.si/fileadmin/mizs.gov.si/pageuploads/ANG/Organisation and Financing of Education Act Oct 2016.pdf

MŠMT (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports). (2004). Act no. 561/2004 collection of law, on pre-school, basic, secondary, tertiary professional and other education (the education act). In Sbirka zakonů ČR. Retrieved from http://www.msmt.cz/uploads/soubory/IMzakon561ponovelach.pdf

NUV (National Institute for Education). (2018). Development of education. Retrieved from http://www.nuv.cz/our-work/development

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2016). PISA 2015 Results (volume I): excellence and equity in education, PISA, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

Parinduri, R.A. (2014). Do children spend too much time in schools? Evidence from a longer school year in Indonesia. Economics of Education Review, 41(2014), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.05.001

Patall, E., Cooper, H. & Allen, A. (2010). Extending the school day or school year. Review of Educational ResearchI, 80(3), 401–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310377086

Pevkur, H. (2011). Appendix 4 of regulation no. 1 of the government of the republic of Estonia – subject field: natural science. Retrieved from https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/est basic school nat cur 2014 appendix 4 final.pdf

Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (183–203). Rochester, NY, US: University of Rochester Press.

VUP (Research Institute of Education). (2007). Framework educational programme for elementary education. Prague. Retrieved from http://www.nuv.cz/file/195