The development of self-assessment accuracy in mathematical word problems: A study of primary school learners
Smetackova2025

Keywords

self-assessment
learning
metacognition
self-regulation
primary school
mathematics

How to Cite

Smetáčková, I., & Páchová, A. (2025). The development of self-assessment accuracy in mathematical word problems: A study of primary school learners. Scientia in Educatione, 16(2), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.5068

Abstract

Self-assessment, as a critical component of self-regulated learning, plays a significant role in improving learning achievement. This study focuses on the accuracy of self-assessment in the context of mathematical word problems among primary school students. The evolution of self-assessment accuracy was examined between the second and third grades. The impact of cognitive abilities, mathematical knowledge, and teacher evaluations was investigated. Data were collected from a sample of 542 primary school pupils. Our findings reveal that students demonstrated greater accuracy in self-assessing their performance in mathematical word problems in Year 2 compared to Year 3. This self-assessment accuracy varied based on cognitive abilities and the pedagogical environments. These findings suggest the importance of creating adequate classroom conditions to enhance self-assessment accuracy.

https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.5068
Smetackova2025

References

Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087

Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544

Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2020). Metacognitive learning strategies in mathematics classroom intervention: A review of implementation and operational design aspect. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0555. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5937

Bandura, A. (2014). Social-cognitive theory. In R. B. Ewen, An introduction to theories of personality (pp. 341–360). Psychology Press.

Barana, A., Boetti, G., & Marchisio, M. (2022). Self-assessment in the development of mathematical problem-solving skills. Education Sciences, 12(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020081

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Research into practice: Formative assessment for learning. In E. F. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Research on Physics Education (pp. 91–102). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3254/978-1-61499-012-3-91

Bradshaw, B. K. (2001). Do pupils effectively monitor their comprehension? Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 41(3), 2. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading horizons/vol41/iss3/2

Broadfoot, P. (2021). The sociology of assessment: Comparative and policy perspectives. The selected works of Patricia Broadfoot. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429262609

Brookhart, S.M., Andolina, M., Zuza, M., & Furman, R. (2004). Minute math: An action research study of student self-assessment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049293.55249.d4

Brown, G. T., Andrade, H. L., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523

Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Sage.

Brown, G., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 2(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24

Cera, R., Mancini, M., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Relationships between metacognition, self-efficacy and self-regulation in learning. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 4(7), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2013-007-cera

Chytrý, V., Říčan, J., & Živná, D. (2019). Matematická výkonnost a metakognice žáků základních škol běžných, základních škol Montessori a žáků vyučovaných podle Hejného metody. Studia paedagogica, 24(1), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2019-1-5

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

De Bruin, A. B., & van Gog, T. (2012). Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.01.003

Downing, S. M. (2006). Twelve steps for effective test development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3–25). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x

Elder, A. D. (2010). Children’s self-assessment of their school work in elementary school. Education 3–13, 38(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802602044

Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119401

Harter, S. (2011). The development of self-representations. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 229–245). Guilford Press.

Kajamies, A., Vauras, M., & Kinnunen, R. (2010). Instructing low-achievers in mathematical word problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(4), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2010.493341

Klenowski, V. (1995). Student self-evaluation processes in student-centred teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594950020203

Kramarski, B., & Revach, T. (2009). The challenge of self-regulated learning in mathematics teachers’ professional training. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9204-2

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121

Li, Z., & Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2017). Teachers matter: Expectancy effects in Chinese university English-as-a-foreign-language classrooms. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2042–2060. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130692

Liu-Ambrose, T., Davis, J. C., Nagamatsu, L. S., Hsu, C. L., Katarynych, L. A., & Khan, K. M. (2010). Changes in executive functions and self-efficacy are independently associated with improved usual gait speed in older women. BMC geriatrics, 10(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-25

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Nováková, E. (2024). Metacognitive skills of pupils in primary mathematics education. Journal of Elementary Education, 17(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.3274

Orth, U., Dapp, L. C., Erol, R. Y., Krauss, S., & Luciano, E. C. (2021). Development of domain-specific self-evaluations: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(1), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000378

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004

Pape, S. J., Bell, C. V., & Yetkin, I. E. (2003). Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: A teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(3), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026062121857

Perry, N. E., Phillips, L., & Hutchinson, L. (2006). Mentoring student teachers to support self-regulated learning. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/501485

Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). Academic Press.

Rendl, M., Vondrová, N., Hřibková, L., Jirotková, D., Kloboučková, J., Kvasz, L., & Žalská, J. (2013). Kritická místa matematiky na základní škole očima učitelů [Critical places of primary mathematics in the eyes of teachers]. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Pedagogická fakulta.

Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/9wph-vv65

Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Rolheiser, C. (2002). Student self-evaluation in grade 5–6 mathematics: Effects on problem-solving achievement. Educational Assessment, 8(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0801 03

Šauerová Švamberk, M., & Smetáčková, I. (2022). Accuracy of pupils’self-assessment. EduPort, 6(2), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.21062/edp.2022.009

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition

as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

Siegesmund, A. (2017). Using self-assessment to develop metacognition and self-regulated learners. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364(11), fnx096. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx096

Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2010.51428542

Taber, K. S. (2025). Mediated learning leading development: The social development theory of Lev Vygotsky. In B. Akpan & T. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (2nd ed., pp. 275–292). Springer.

Tachie, S. A. (2019). Meta-cognitive skills and strategies application: How this helps learners in mathematics problem-solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), em1702. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105364

Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390

Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and adolescence: Development and plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00246.x

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In D. H. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15–26). Routledge.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).