Moral Education in Secondary Schools: What, how, and why?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2019.1526Klíčová slova:
secondary school, moral education, virtue ethics, the idea of the universityAbstrakt
Abstract: The paper argues for a philosophical approach to the teaching of moral education in secondary schools. Because students at this level are already capable of conceptual thinking, but are still at a formative stage, teachers can encourage them in their autonomous thought and life orientation through reference to meta-ethical authorities. In terms of these authorities, students may be led to fi nd that there is something (beauty, truth, goodness) other than the ordinary, narrow concerns of everyday life. At the same time, truth or beauty should be unveiled in everyday life; ordinary matters such as language must be revealed as moral concerns, and be liberated from vulgarity. For this to provide a suffi cient experience of things beautiful and good, I argue, the ethos of moral education at secondary schools should reflect the ethos of the university. I also argue that we need this kind of education to counterbalance the expanding informational and consumer character of our society, and to give meaning to the life of every participating individual. Finally, I warn against doctrinal simplifi cation, specifically, the misuse of the liberal spirit of the university and moral education (using the example of the Czech National School Curriculum).
Keywords: secondary school; moral education; virtue ethics; the idea of the university
Reference
Barabas, M. (1999). The agent's erosion of value. In V. Havlík (Ed.), Mezi jazykem a vědomím [Between language and consciousness] (pp. 157-181). Prague: Filosofia.
Bell, D. (1999). The coming of postindustrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
Derrida, J., & Roudinesco, E. (2004). For what tomorrow …: A dialogue. Trans. J. Fort. Stanford University Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
Gaita, R. (2004). A common humanity, thinking about love and truth and justice. London: Routledge.
Grygar, F. (2005). Kritika založení galileovské vědy v Husserlově "krizi evropských věd a transcendentální fenomenologii" [Criticism of the founding of Galilee science in Husserl's "crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology"]. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.
Gutschmidt, H. (2010). Von der 'Idee einer Universität' zur 'Zukunft unserer Bildungsanstalten' - Bildungsbegriff und Universitatsgedanke in der deutschen Philosophie von Schiller bis Nietzsche. In J. Stolzenberg & L. Ulrichs, L. (Eds.), Bildung als Kunst: Fichte, Schiller, Humboldt, Nietzsche (pp. 149-167). Berlin: Gruyter.
Hábl, J. (2015). I když se nikdo nedívá [Even though no one is watching]. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.
Hampshire, S. (2001). Justice is conflict: The soul and the city (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Harvard University, October 30-31, 1996). Princeton University Press.
Hejdánek, L. (1988). Myšlenkový deník [Thought Diary] 31. 12. 1988 (pp. 88-1085). Archive of Ladislav Hejdánek.
Hejdánek, L. (1990). Variace a reflexe na témata vězeňských dopisů Václava Havla [Variations and reflection on the themes of Václav Havel prison letters]. Listy, 20(6).
Hejdánek, L. (1994). Separát. Římský klub [Reprint. Roman Club]. In L. Hejdánek, Etické "normy" a "hodnoty" jako vědecký a filosofický problém [Ethical "norms" and "values" as a scientific and philosophical problem]. Archive of Ladislav Hejdánek.
Hejdánek, L. (1997). Nepředmětnost v myšlení a ve skutečnosti [Objectivity in thinking and in reality]. Prague: Oikoymenh.
Hejduk, T. (2012). Idea university na střední škole [The idea of a secondary-school university]. Pedagogika, 62(3), 339-345.
Holland, R. F. (1980). Education and value. In Against empiricism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Chappell, T. (2014). Knowing what to do. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684854.001.0001
Kilpatrick, W. (1992). Why Johnny can't tell right from wrong: Moral illiteracy and the case for character education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Komárková, B. (1997). Reformace a moderní stát [Reformation and the modern state]. In Lidská práva [Human rights] (pp. 49-57). Heršpice: Eman.
Květina, J. (2016). Koncepce liberalismu a demokracie v edukačním procesu: dekonstrukce neoliberální dominance v RVP [Conceptions of liberalism and democracy in the educational Process: A deconstruction of neo/liberal dominance in the RVP (Framework Educational Plan)]. Pedagogika, 66(3), 312-329. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2015.722
Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam.
Newman, J. H. (1996). The idea of a university. Yale University Press.
Oakeshott, M. (2003). The idea of a university. Academic Questions, 17(1).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12129-003-1045-3
Patočka, J. (1996). Filosofie výchovy [Philosophy of education]. In J. Patočka, Péče o duši I [Soul Care I]. Praha: Oikoymenh.
Patočka, J. (1996a). Harmonismus moderních humanist [Harmonism of modern humanists]. In J. Patočka, Péče o duši I [Soul Care I]. Praha: Oikoymenh.
Patočka, J. (1996b). Mládí a filosofie [Youth and philosophy]. In J. Patočka, Péče o duši I [Soul Care I]. Praha: Oikoymenh.
Patočka, J. (2012). Platónova péče o duši a spravedlivý stát [Plato's care of the soul and a just state]. Praha: Oikoymenh.
Petrusek, M. (2007). Vychováváme člověka vzdělaného nebo informovaného? Současné vzdělávací systémy v čase postmodernity [Do we raise an educated or informed person? Contemporary educational systems in the time of postmodernity]. (Lecture). Conference Jan Amos Komenský - 350 let od vydání Opera Didactica Omnia [350 years since the release of Opera Didactica Omnia], Prague, November 15-17, 2007.
Rorty, R. (2000). The moral purposes of the university: An exchange. The Hedgehog Review, 2(3), 106-119.
Shils, E. (1997). The calling of education: The academic ethic and other essays on higher education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226753409.001.0001
Strauss, L. (1995). What is liberal education? In Liberalism Ancient and Modern. University of Chicago Press.
Svobodová, Z. (2012). Škola a vzdělávání v oblasti etiky: K etické výchově jako školnímu předmětu [School and education in the field of ethics: To ethical education as a school subject]. In Z. Svobodová (ed.), Důstojně a radostně [With dignity and joy]. Středokluky: Zdeněk Susa.
Štech, S. (2011). Profesionalita učitele v neoliberální době [Teacher's professionalism in the neoliberal era]. (Lecture). Meeting of the Lípa Association in Lázně Bělohrad, November 25-27, 2011. Available from: http://www.lipa.cz/doc/28/01.pdf.
Thiessen, E. J. (1993). Teaching for commitment: Liberal education, indoctrination, and Christian nurture. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Various authors (2007), Rámcový vzdělávací program pro gymnázia [The Czech National School Curriculum]. Prague: VÚP.
Winner, L. (1994). Three paradoxes of the information age. In G. Bender & T. Druckrey (Eds.), Culture on the brink. Seattle: Bay Press.
https://doi.org/10.1109/18.340450
Williams, B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Williams, B. (2006). What might philosophy become? In B. Williams, Philosophy as a humanistic discipline. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Znoj, M., Bíba, J., & Vargovčíková, J. (2014). Demokracie v postliberální konstelaci [Democracy in a post-liberal constellation]. Prague: Karolinum.
